Loading Page...

Are planes worse for the environment than cars?

For example, a study by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute states the energy intensity of car transportation is on average 57% higher than air transports. In other words, a car emits more CO2 than the average planes because they consume more energy to transport the same amount of passengers.



In 2026, the answer depends on occupancy and distance. On a "per passenger mile" basis, a long-distance flight on a modern, fuel-efficient aircraft like an Airbus A350 often emits less CO2 than a single person driving an average internal combustion engine car for the same distance. However, for short distances (under 300 miles), cars—especially Electric Vehicles (EVs)—are significantly better for the environment than planes. Aviation has a unique environmental impact because it releases emissions at high altitudes, which has a higher "radiative forcing" effect on global warming. Furthermore, the total carbon footprint of a flight is concentrated into a few hours, whereas car emissions are more dispersed. For 2026 travelers, the "greenest" option for medium distances is almost always a high-speed train, followed by a fully-loaded car, and then a flight.

People Also Ask

Comparing greenhouse gas emissions Essentially, one long flight releases the equivalent of nearly 14 percent of the annual emissions from your car. The same route, when driven, will result in the release of 1.26 tons of carbon emissions.

MORE DETAILS

Planes Remain A Problematic Means Of Transport Air traffic represents less than 2-3% of the global CO2 emissions whereas road traffic accounts for around 10% of these direct emissions. Still, planes remain among the most polluting means of transport, together with cars.

MORE DETAILS

Just exactly how bad is flying really? Air travel accounts for 2.5% of global carbon emissions. In the US, flying accounted for 8% of transportation emissions, but less than 3% of total carbon emissions.

MORE DETAILS

In fact, unless you're looking to venture from Los Altos to LA off-road through state parks the whole way—in a Hummer with Tonka-truck mud tires—driving is generally greener than flying.

MORE DETAILS

The main difference between flying and driving to a vacation is time spent. Benefits and drawbacks vary for either; driving can make hard-to-reach areas accessible, but risks traffic and high gas prices. Flying, meanwhile, allows you to multitask, but you're at the whim of airlines.

MORE DETAILS

Aviation is responsible for between 2pc and 3pc of global carbon emissions. And Ms Thunberg continues to refuse to fly because of the impact on the environment.

MORE DETAILS

While most people think driving a car is better for the environment than flying in an airplane, that's not necessarily true because airplane engines are getting much more efficient.

MORE DETAILS

For example, a study by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute states the energy intensity of car transportation is on average 57% higher than air transports. In other words, a car emits more CO2 than the average planes because they consume more energy to transport the same amount of passengers.

MORE DETAILS

CO2 emissions from aviation fuel are 3.15 grams per gram of fuel [1], which gives CO2 emissions from a Boeing 737-400 of 115 g per passenger per km. At a cruising speed of 780 km per hour [Wikipedia, 28.2. 08], this is equivalent to 90 kg CO2 per passenger per hour.

MORE DETAILS

Personal planes have significantly higher emissions than other modes of transport. An average journey in one produces CO2 equivalent to driving a petrol car from Paris to Rome 16 times.

MORE DETAILS

Taking the train or ferry works out to be around seven times less polluting than travelling by plane, according to various estimates. Travelling by train is slightly greener than taking the ferry, in terms of emissions.

MORE DETAILS

Driving vs. Flying By the Numbers The overall fatality risk is 0.23% — you would need to fly every day for more than 10,000 years to be in a fatal plane crash. On the other hand, the chances of dying in a car collision are about 1 in 101, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

MORE DETAILS

For the shortest trip, driving is slightly more economical than flying. But for the longer cross-country trip, flying is far cheaper. And keep in mind that this only considers solo drivers. Families or friends traveling in one vehicle can save money by driving, even on longer routes.

MORE DETAILS

Train travel is the most ecologically friendly option, aside from walking or bicycling. They emit 66-75% less carbon emissions than other forms of transportation, even if they're electric.

MORE DETAILS

Airplanes become more fuel efficient with every generation, and there are plenty of ways old planes can be spruced up. Winglets can be added on to the end of wing's, reducing drag and reducing fuel consumption by 6 percent.

MORE DETAILS

Rail Travel Travel by rail within cities or across long distances releases the least amount of greenhouse gasses into the air out of all forms of transportation studied by the International Energy Agency (IEA, p.

MORE DETAILS

“The global aviation industry produces around 2% of all human-induced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Aviation is responsible for 12% of CO2 emissions from all transports sources, compared to 74% from road transport.”

MORE DETAILS

Aviation contributes about 3 percent of all carbon emissions worldwide, which would make it sixth in the world if it were a country. The airline industry's contribution to the climate problem is worse than that, however, if we consider that flight also produces pollution other than carbon.

MORE DETAILS