Loading Page...

Did Concorde have reverse thrust?

The Concorde supersonic airliner could use reverse thrust in the air to increase the rate of descent. Only the inboard engines were used, and the engines were placed in reverse idle only in subsonic flight and when the aircraft was below 30,000 ft (9,100 m) in altitude.



Yes, the Concorde was equipped with a highly unique reverse thrust system that could be used both on the ground and, unusually, while in flight. On the ground, reverse thrust was used during the landing roll to assist the brakes in slowing the aircraft down from its high landing speed. In the air, pilots could engage the reverse thrust on the two inboard engines while the aircraft was in a subsonic descent. This was used to significantly increase the rate of descent and help the aircraft slow down more quickly as it moved from supersonic cruise to the approach phase. Engaging reverse thrust in-flight created a distinct rumbling sound and a slight vibration that passengers could feel. This capability was a necessity for Concorde because its streamlined, aerodynamic design made it "slippery," meaning it did not slow down as easily as conventional subsonic airliners. This engineering feature allowed the aircraft to fit into standard air traffic patterns while maintaining its sleek, supersonic profile.

People Also Ask

Afterburning was added to Concorde for take-off to cope with weight increases that came after the initial design. It was also used to accelerate through the high-drag transonic speed range, not because the extra thrust was required, but because it was available and improved the operating economics.

MORE DETAILS

A380s are designed to come to a complete stop using their brakes alone. Ultimately the decision was made to put reverse thrust on two engines to help minimize the risk of aquaplaning. But it was also decided that reverse thrust on all four of the A380 engines was definitely overkill.

MORE DETAILS

British Airways and Air France were the only two airlines who operated the aircraft. It's said that during the aircraft's 27 years of service, there were more qualified American astronauts than there were British Airways Concorde pilots.

MORE DETAILS

The challenges of manufacturing and certifying new parts, maintaining a licensed flight crew capable of flying it, and ongoing maintenance and preservation mean we are no closer to seeing Concorde flying again since its last flight in 2003.

MORE DETAILS

Concorde used the most powerful pure jet engines flying commercially. The Aircraft's four engines took advantage of what is known as 'reheat' technology, adding fuel to the final stage of the engine, which produced the extra power required for take-off and the transition to supersonic flight.

MORE DETAILS

The Concorde carried out supersonic flights until 2003, when it was retired. Also, because the plane flew faster than the speed of sound, it created a sonic boom, an explosive noise caused by shock waves that were a nuisance to people on the ground.

MORE DETAILS

So, to answer the question, yes, some fighter jets are faster than the Concorde. However, it is important to note that the Concorde was primarily designed for passenger travel, not for combat or aerial maneuvers.

MORE DETAILS

Most airplanes can taxi backwards by using reverse thrust. This entails directing the thrust produced by the plane's jet engines forward, rather than backwards. This method is often used in jet aircraft to brake as quickly as possible after touchdown.

MORE DETAILS

Such speed didn't come cheap, though: A transatlantic flight required the high-maintenance aircraft to gulp jet fuel at the rate of one ton per seat, and the average round-trip price was $12,000.

MORE DETAILS

The aircraft quickly proved itself unquestionably as it reached speeds of up to 1,354 mph. To put that into context, that is around 800 mph faster than a Boeing 747 and over 350 mph faster than the earth spins on its axis!

MORE DETAILS

Fighter jets are designed with maneuverability and speed in mind. A thrust reversal system comes with a mass penalty. This can reduce both the speed and maneuverability. They also increase the complexity of the maintenance process.

MORE DETAILS

While it is possible for an A380 to operate on a single engine, it is not ideal as the aircraft would experience a decrease in speed, drag, and loss of altitude, making it crucial for the crew to restart the other engines or find a suitable airport for an emergency landing.

MORE DETAILS