Maintaining correct distance between train and guideway is not a concern (Lee, 2006). The drawbacks are that sufficient speed needs to be built up in order for the train to levitate at all. Additionally, this system is much more complex and costly to implement.

The primary disadvantage of Maglev (magnetic levitation) technology in 2026 remains its total lack of compatibility with existing rail infrastructure. Unlike traditional high-speed trains (like the TGV or Shinkansen) that can transition onto standard tracks to reach city centers, Maglevs require entirely unique, dedicated guideways. This leads to astronomical initial construction costs, often three to four times higher per mile than conventional rail. Additionally, Maglevs are highly energy-intensive at peak speeds (above 500 km/h) due to the power required to maintain both levitation and propulsion. Other drawbacks include the "straight-line" requirement; because the trains move so fast, they cannot handle tight curves, necessitating expensive tunneling through mountains rather than going around them. Finally, because the technology is niche, the global supply chain for parts and specialized maintenance is limited, creating a "vendor lock-in" for any government that chooses to implement it.