History's perspective on the "good guys" of the Alamo has evolved into a complex, multi-faceted narrative that moves beyond the traditional 20th-century "heroic" depiction. Traditionally, the "good guys" were portrayed as the 189 defenders—including Davy Crockett and Jim Bowie—fighting for liberty against the "tyrannical" Mexican General Santa Anna. They were seen as martyrs for Texas independence. However, modern historical analysis in 2026 emphasizes a more nuanced reality: many of the Anglo-Texan colonists were fighting not just for political freedom, but also to preserve the institution of slavery, which Mexico had abolished. On the other side, the Mexican army was legally defending its sovereign territory against an armed insurrection, though Santa Anna’s brutal "no-quarter" policy (executing all survivors) led to his depiction as a villain. To many Tejanos (Mexicans living in Texas at the time), the "good guys" were those who sought a return to the democratic Mexican Constitution of 1824. Ultimately, who you consider the "good guy" depends on whether you prioritize the ideals of self-determination or the historical context of land sovereignty and social justice.