Maglev (magnetic levitation) trains are technically superior in speed and maintenance but face three primary hurdles: astronomical infrastructure costs, lack of interoperability, and high energy consumption at low speeds. Building a maglev line requires entirely new, specialized guideways that cannot share tracks with existing conventional rail networks, meaning governments cannot phase them in gradually. The construction cost per mile for maglev is often three to four times higher than high-speed rail. Additionally, while they have no friction, the energy required to lift a massive train and propel it through air resistance at 500 km/h is immense. In 2026, while China and Japan continue to develop flagship lines (like the Chuo Shinkansen), most countries favor "standard" high-speed rail because it integrates with current stations and is far more cost-effective for taxpayers. The "interoperability" issue is the biggest dealbreaker; a maglev train cannot simply "switch" onto a standard line to reach a city center, forcing passengers to transfer, which reduces the overall time-saving benefit of the high-speed journey.