Loading Page...

How loud was Concorde taking off?

The Concorde was famously loud: a take-off at Washington airport in 1977 measured 119.4 decibels. By comparison, a clap of thunder hits 120 decibels while the pain threshold for the human ear is around 110.



The Concorde was famously the loudest commercial airliner ever operated, producing a deafening 119 to 125 decibels (dB) during its takeoff roll and initial climb. For context, 120 dB is the "threshold of pain" for the human ear and is equivalent to standing next to a loud thunderclap or a chainsaw. The intense noise was primarily caused by its four massive Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593 turbojet engines, which required afterburners (reheat) to generate enough thrust for takeoff. This sonic footprint was so powerful that it frequently set off car alarms in parking lots near JFK and Heathrow airports. In 2026, aviation historians note that this extreme noise pollution was a major factor in the Concorde being banned from supersonic flight over land and restricted to specific "noise-abatement" runways. While modern jets like the Airbus A350 take off at around 85–90 dB, the Concorde’s roar remains a legendary, albeit disruptive, symbol of the era of supersonic travel that hasn't been matched by any passenger plane since its retirement.

The Concorde’s takeoff was exceptionally loud, but it’s important to distinguish between two perspectives: on the ground and inside the cabin.

On the Ground (The Infamous Sonic Boom & Airport Noise)

  1. Sonic Boom: This was its most famous sound, but it only occurred after takeoff, once it accelerated past the speed of sound (Mach 1) over the ocean. The sonic boom was a double thunderclap so powerful it could rattle windows and shake the ground. It’s why the Concorde was banned from flying supersonically over populated land masses (like the US and Europe), restricting its supersonic routes mostly over the Atlantic.
  2. Takeoff Noise at the Airport: The Concorde’s takeoff was significantly louder than modern subsonic jets. It required afterburners (reheat) to achieve the necessary thrust for its delta-wing design to take off. This created a distinctive, thunderous roar with visible flames from its four Olympus 593 engines.
    • Measured Noise: At takeoff, it produced around 119-120 Perceived Noise Decibels (PNdB). To compare, a modern Boeing 787 Dreamliner produces about 85-90 PNdB on takeoff. The Concorde was about 30 times more intense acoustically (due to the logarithmic decibel scale).
    • Consequence: This extreme noise was a major reason it was banned from many airports, including its intended home at London Heathrow for a time, due to strict local noise regulations. It was mostly restricted to major international hubs like JFK and Paris Charles de Ga

People Also Ask

People inside the plane didn't hear a thing. In fact, the transition to supersonic flight was so unimpressive that they decided to install a “mach meter” inside the passenger cabin so that people would know then they passed the speed of sound.

MORE DETAILS

Because of the thunderous sonic boom Concorde trailed behind it whenever it flew faster than Mach 1, the speed of sound. As much as Americans embrace speed and convenience, the Concorde's nerve-jangling bang was unacceptable, especially since most could never afford to fly it.

MORE DETAILS

Fifty years ago, the federal government banned all civilian supersonic flights over land. The rule prohibits non-military aircraft from flying faster than sound so their resulting sonic booms won't startle the public below or concern them about potential property damage.

MORE DETAILS

Flying at Mach 2 – about 1,350mph – the Concorde could fly 100 passengers and a crew of nine from NYC to London in an average of three hours and 30 minutes.

MORE DETAILS

Below Mach 1.3, this would dissipate in the atmosphere, but Concorde could 'supercruise' at Mach 2, twice the speed of sound, causing a noise like a thunderclap to be heard on the ground.

MORE DETAILS

The challenges of manufacturing and certifying new parts, maintaining a licensed flight crew capable of flying it, and ongoing maintenance and preservation mean we are no closer to seeing Concorde flying again since its last flight in 2003.

MORE DETAILS

So, to answer the question, yes, some fighter jets are faster than the Concorde. However, it is important to note that the Concorde was primarily designed for passenger travel, not for combat or aerial maneuvers.

MORE DETAILS

Over the Irish sea and rapidly running out of fuel the Tornado had a hard time catching up with the mighty Concorde. Over more than a hundred miles or so, 5–10 minutes the Concord could outrun every fighter.

MORE DETAILS

Concorde used the most powerful pure jet engines flying commercially. The Aircraft's four engines took advantage of what is known as 'reheat' technology, adding fuel to the final stage of the engine, which produced the extra power required for take-off and the transition to supersonic flight.

MORE DETAILS

Afterburning was added to Concorde for take-off to cope with weight increases that came after the initial design. It was also used to accelerate through the high-drag transonic speed range, not because the extra thrust was required, but because it was available and improved the operating economics.

MORE DETAILS

Such speed didn't come cheap, though: A transatlantic flight required the high-maintenance aircraft to gulp jet fuel at the rate of one ton per seat, and the average round-trip price was $12,000.

MORE DETAILS

Concorde is sadly no longer flying, but it is still possible to visit some of the remaining 18 airframes, there are others not open to the public but you can still see them.

MORE DETAILS

The aircraft quickly proved itself unquestionably as it reached speeds of up to 1,354 mph. To put that into context, that is around 800 mph faster than a Boeing 747 and over 350 mph faster than the earth spins on its axis!

MORE DETAILS