Loading Page...

Is driving more eco-friendly than flying?

So, if you're traveling with three or more people, driving is the better option, and here's why: Three people on the cross-country flight would account for 1.86 tons of carbon emissions (0.62 tons of CO2 x 3), compared to the total 1.26 tons of carbon the vehicle would produce (ignoring that the extra weight would ...



Determining whether driving is more eco-friendly than flying depends heavily on passenger load and distance. In 2026, a solo driver in a standard gasoline car often has a higher carbon footprint per mile than a passenger on a full, modern commercial flight. However, a car with three or more passengers is statistically more efficient than flying for short-to-medium distances. Aviation remains the second biggest source of transport emissions (after road transport) and is harder to "green" due to high-altitude non-CO2​ effects like contrails. If you are driving an Electric Vehicle (EV) charged with renewable energy, driving is vastly more eco-friendly regardless of the passenger count. For most long-haul routes, flying remains the dominant polluter per hour spent traveling.

People Also Ask

In the US, traveling by car uses more than double the energy you need to fly---unless you're behind the wheel of a new hybrid. When I moved to San Francisco from New York last year to join WIRED, my new boss scolded me for flying instead of enjoying an epic road trip. (Are you driving cross-country? he implored.

MORE DETAILS

Taking a seven-day cruise is more than three times as carbon-intensive as flying and staying abroad.

MORE DETAILS

Finally, the plane is the most polluting means of transport and the one that generates the most greenhouse emissions.

MORE DETAILS

Train travel is the most ecologically friendly option, aside from walking or bicycling. They emit 66-75% less carbon emissions than other forms of transportation, even if they're electric.

MORE DETAILS

Trains. Besides walking and biking, traveling by train remains one of the greenest and most environment-friendly options when getting around. Regardless if electric or diesel-powered, trains emit between 66 and 75 percent fewer carbon emissions when compared to cars and airplanes.

MORE DETAILS

In fact, when choosing between planes, trains, and automobiles, Americans prefer traveling by plane least. A survey of 2,000 Americans revealed that three in four (73%) people feel that road tripping is a much more pleasant experience than flying.

MORE DETAILS

For example, a study by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute states the energy intensity of car transportation is on average 57% higher than air transports. In other words, a car emits more CO2 than the average planes because they consume more energy to transport the same amount of passengers.

MORE DETAILS

The main difference between flying and driving to a vacation is time spent. Benefits and drawbacks vary for either; driving can make hard-to-reach areas accessible, but risks traffic and high gas prices. Flying, meanwhile, allows you to multitask, but you're at the whim of airlines.

MORE DETAILS

While most people think driving a car is better for the environment than flying in an airplane, that's not necessarily true because airplane engines are getting much more efficient.

MORE DETAILS

Top 10 polluters
  • China, with more than 10,065 million tons of CO2 released.
  • United States, with 5,416 million tons of CO2.
  • India, with 2,654 million tons of CO2.
  • Russia, with 1,711 million tons of CO2.
  • Japan, 1,162 million tons of CO2.
  • Germany, 759 million tons of CO2.
  • Iran, 720 million tons of CO2.


MORE DETAILS

A June study from sustainable transport campaigner The European Federation for Transport and Environment found that 63 cruise ships owned by parent company Carnival Corporation emitted 43% more sulfur oxides, a group of harmful air pollutants, than all the 291 million cars in Europe in 2022.

MORE DETAILS

Just exactly how bad is flying really? Air travel accounts for 2.5% of global carbon emissions. In the US, flying accounted for 8% of transportation emissions, but less than 3% of total carbon emissions.

MORE DETAILS

Just exactly how bad is flying really? Air travel accounts for 2.5% of global carbon emissions. In the US, flying accounted for 8% of transportation emissions, but less than 3% of total carbon emissions.

MORE DETAILS